\documentstyle[doublespace,fullpage]{article}
\begin{document}
Subquestions for 24.01 paper \#7

Main question: What, according to Rawls, is the difference between
deciding conscientiously to engage in civil disobedience and deciding
as one pleases?  Why is it important for his purposes that it be
possible to draw a distinction between the two?  Do you find his
account of the difference convincing?

Subquestions:
\begin{itemize}

\item According to Rawls:

\begin{itemize}

\item What does it mean to decide conscientiously to engage in civil
disobedience?

\item What does lawlessness entail for society?  Why is this not
acceptable?

\item If civil disobedience is not deciding as one pleases, then what
is it?

\item How does this make civil disobedience substantially different
from lawlessness?  How can we observe the difference?

\item Why is it necessary for there to be a distinction between civil
disobedience and lawlessness?

\end{itemize}

\item Objectively:

\begin{itemize}

\item Does Rawls' account of civil disobedience make it substantially
and convincingly different from lawlessness?

\item Is this difference enough for civil disobedience to be
justifiable as an integral part of society?

\end{itemize}

\end{itemize}

\end{document}
