\documentstyle[12pt]{article}
\pagestyle{empty}
\parindent=0pt
\parskip=\baselineskip
\begin{document}
\hfill
\begin{tabular}{l}
Marc Horowitz \\
Quiz 3 \\
Galagan F2
\end{tabular}

1. The WAIS tests both fluid intelligence and crystallized
intelligence.  These are different types of intelligence.  Fluid
intelligence deals with solving problems which are new to the solver.
This would be measured by WAIS subtests like picture completion and
object assembly.  Crystallized intelligence deals with stored
knowledge.  This would be measure by WAIS subtests like vocabulary and
comprehension.

2.  It would be possible to answer the picture arrangement tests
correctly according to the taker, but incorrectly according to the
test.  For instance, the flirting story involves social norms from
when the test was written in 1955, which might be different in another
society of the time, or different today.  This implies that the test
is biased towards people who are sociologically similar to the writers
of the test.

3.  The psychometric approach to intelligence works by measuring
skills which are commonly attributed to intelligence.  If these
measurements correlate with what we intuitively consider to be
intelligence, then we look further to try to determine what underlying
mental abilities are really being measured by the tests.

The information-processing approach works by trying to determine what
the basic components of cognitive ability are, measuring them, and
learning how they combine to form more complex cognitive tasks.

\end{document}
