| United States Patent |
6,493,491
|
|
Shen
,   et al.
|
December 10, 2002
|
Optical drop cable for aerial installation
Abstract
An aerial drop cable comprises a jacket surrounding a cavity containing a
least one loosely housed optical fiber and a pair of reinforcing members
composed of a plurality of high modulus fibers such as polybenzoxazole
(PBO) fibers. The cross-sectional area of the reinforcing members is
larger than the cross-sectional area of the cavity so that the optical
fiber disposed in the cavity is protected from lateral compressive forces.
By utilizing reinforcing members which are composed of PBO fibers, the
diameter of the reinforcing members is reduced as compared with
conventional reinforcing members composed of aramid, metal or glass
thereby providing a substantial reduction in the amount of jacketing
material and the weight of the cable. Further, the bending strain of the
cable utilizing PBO reinforcing members is substantially reduced for an
equivalent bending radius as compared with cables utilizing conventional
reinforcing members due to the smaller diameter of the reinforcing
members. Therefore, the bending radius of the cable is reduced providing
greater flexibility for routing the cable.
| Inventors:
|
Shen; Steven X. (Hickory, NC);
Risch; Brian G. (Hickory, NC)
|
| Assignee:
|
Alcatel (Paris, FR)
|
| Appl. No.:
|
671747 |
| Filed:
|
September 28, 2000 |
| Current U.S. Class: |
385/113; 385/100; 385/109 |
| Intern'l Class: |
G02B 006/44 |
| Field of Search: |
385/100-113
|
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| 4148560 | Apr., 1979 | Margolis | 350/96.
|
| 4195906 | Apr., 1980 | Dean et al. | 385/113.
|
| 4199225 | Apr., 1980 | Slaughter et al. | 385/113.
|
| 4262703 | Apr., 1981 | Moore et al. | 138/115.
|
| 4420220 | Dec., 1983 | Dean et al. | 385/113.
|
| 4611656 | Sep., 1986 | Kendall, Jr. et al. | 166/65.
|
| 4761053 | Aug., 1988 | Cogelia et al. | 385/113.
|
| 5043037 | Aug., 1991 | Buckland | 156/166.
|
| 5125063 | Jun., 1992 | Panuska et al. | 385/113.
|
| 5155304 | Oct., 1992 | Gossett et al. | 174/117.
|
| 5165003 | Nov., 1992 | Carter | 385/112.
|
| 5180890 | Jan., 1993 | Pendergrass et al. | 174/117.
|
| 5196259 | Mar., 1993 | Pierini et al. | 428/245.
|
| RE34516 | Jan., 1994 | Houghton | 385/103.
|
| 5508376 | Apr., 1996 | Dang et al. | 528/328.
|
| 5552221 | Sep., 1996 | So et al. | 428/373.
|
| 5673352 | Sep., 1997 | Bauer et al. | 385/114.
|
| 5802231 | Sep., 1998 | Nagano et al. | 385/114.
|
| 5825956 | Oct., 1998 | Missout et al. | 385/102.
|
| 5911023 | Jun., 1999 | Risch et al. | 385/100.
|
| 5922259 | Jul., 1999 | Okuyama et al. | 264/103.
|
| 5948186 | Sep., 1999 | Yabuki | 152/527.
|
| 5982966 | Nov., 1999 | Bonicel | 385/100.
|
| 5993963 | Nov., 1999 | Teramoto et al. | 428/364.
|
| 5999676 | Dec., 1999 | Hwang | 385/106.
|
| 6134363 | Oct., 2000 | Hinson et al. | 385/100.
|
| 6198865 | Mar., 2001 | Risch | 385/113.
|
| Foreign Patent Documents |
| 9-127380 | May., 1997 | JP.
| |
Other References
Understanding Fiber Optics, Jeff Hecht, Jun. 1999, Prentice Hall, 3rd
edition, pp. 143-159.
|
Primary Examiner: Sircus; Brian
Assistant Examiner: Zarroli; Michael C.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Sughrue Mion, PLLC
Parent Case Text
This application claims benefit of provisional application 60/156,436 filed
Sep. 28, 1999.
Claims
What is claimed is:
1. An aerial optical cable comprising:
a jacket body;
a cavity disposed in a central portion the jacket body;
first and second reinforcing members disposed on opposite sides of said
cavity in end portions of the jacket body, the cavity and the first and
second reinforcing members extending longitudinally in a common plane,
wherein said first and second reinforcing members have a cross-sectional
area which is greater than a cross-sectional area of said cavity; and
a plurality of optical fibers loosely housed in said cavity without the use
of a buffer tube or support member so that said optical fibers can move
independently of each other.
2. An aerial optical cable as claimed in claim 1, further comprising a
water absorbent material disposed in said cavity and surrounding said
optical fibers, said water absorbent material permitting said optical
fibers to freely move within said cavity.
3. An aerial optical cable as claimed in claim 2, wherein said water
absorbent material comprising one of polyacrylates with carboxylate
functional groups, partially neutralized polyacrylic acid, and
polyacrylamides, or copolymers of polyacrylates with carboxylate
functional groups, partially neutralized polyacrylic acid, or
polyacrylamides.
4. An aerial optical cable as claimed in claim 1, further comprising a gel
material is disposed in said cavity and surrounding said optical fibers,
said gel material permitting said optical fibers to freely move within
said cavity.
5. An aerial optical cable as claimed in claim 4, wherein said gel material
comprises at least one silicone, mineral, polyolefin, and a polyol oils
combined with a polymeric thixotropy modifier of pyrogenic silica.
6. An aerial optical cable as claimed in claim 1, wherein said first and
second reinforcing members comprise a non-conductive material.
7. An aerial optical cable as claimed in claim 6, wherein said
non-conductive material comprises polybenzoxazole fibers.
8. An aerial optical cable as claimed in claim 6, wherein said
non-conductive material comprises aramid fibers.
9. An aerial optical cable as claimed in claim 1, wherein said first and
second reinforcing members comprise a metallic material.
10. An aerial optical cable as claimed in claim 1, wherein each of said
optical fibers has an excess fiber length of 0.0 to 0.5%.
11. An aerial optical cable comprising:
a jacket body;
a cavity disposed in a central portion the jacket body;
first and second reinforcing members disposed on opposite sides of said
cavity in end portions of the jacket body, the cavity and the first and
second reinforcing members extending longitudinally in a common plane,
wherein said first and second reinforcing members have a cross-sectional
area which is greater than a cross-sectional area of said cavity; and
at least one optical fiber loosely housed in said cavity, wherein said
jacket body comprises a plastic material that does not contain phthalate
platicizers which can migrate to a coating of said optical fiber.
12. An aerial optical cable as claimed in claim 11, wherein said plastic
material comprises one of polyvinyl chloride, polyethelene and
polypropolyene, or a copolymer comprising polyethelene and polypropolyene.
13. An aerial optical cable comprising:
a jacket body;
a cavity disposed in a central portion the jacket body;
first and second reinforcing members disposed on opposite sides of said
cavity in end portions of the jacket body, the cavity and the first and
second reinforcing members extending longitudinally in a common plane; and
at least one optical fiber loosely housed in said cavity, wherein said
first and second reinforcing members have a modulus greater than 200 GPa.
14. An aerial optical cable comprising:
a jacket body;
a cavity disposed in a central portion the jacket body;
first and second reinforcing members disposed on opposite sides of said
cavity in end portions of the jacket body, wherein the cavity and the
first and second reinforcing members extend longitudinally in a common
plane and the first and second reinforcing members each comprise a
plurality of polybenzoxazole fibers; and
a plurality of optical fibers loosely housed in said cavity without the use
of a buffer tube or support member so that said optical fibers can move
independently of each other.
15. An aerial optical cable as claimed in claim 14, wherein said first and
second reinforcing members have cross-sectional area which is greater than
a cross-sectional area of said cavity.
16. An aerial optical cable as claimed in claim 14, further comprising a
water absorbent material is disposed in said cavity and surrounding said
optical fibers, said water absorbent material permitting said optical
fibers to freely move within said cavity.
17. An aerial optical cable as claimed in claim 16, wherein said water
absorbent material comprising polyacrylates with carboxylate functional
groups, partially neutralized polyacrylic acid, polyacrylamides, or
copolymers of the above; e.g. a copolymer of acrylic acid and sodium
acrylate.
18. An aerial optical cable as claimed in claim 14, further comprising a
gel material is disposed in said cavity and surrounding said optical
fibers, permitting said optical fibers to freely move within said cavity.
19. An aerial optical cable as claimed in claim 18, wherein said gel
material comprises comprising silicone, mineral, polyolefin, and/or a
polyol oils combined with a polymeric thixotropy modifier of pyrogenic
silica.
20. An aerial optical cable as claimed in claim 14, wherein said jacket
body comprises a plastic material that does not contain phthalate
platicizers which can migrate to a coating of said optical fibers.
21. An aerial optical cable as claimed in claim 20, wherein said plastic
material comprises one of polyvinyl chloride, polyethelene and
polypropolyene, or a copolymer comprising ethelene and propolyene.
22. An aerial optical cable as claimed in claim 14, wherein each of said
optical fibers has an excess fiber length of 0.0 to 0.5%.
23. An aerial optical cable comprising:
a jacket body;
a cavity disposed in said jacket body;
an optical fiber housed in said cavity; and
at least one reinforcing member disposed in said jacket body, said
reinforcing member comprising a plurality of fibers having a modulus
greater than 200 GPa and a density less than 2.0 g/cc, wherein said
reinforcing member has a cross-sectional area which is greater than a
cross-sectional area of said cavity.
24. An aerial optical cable as claimed in claim 23, wherein said
reinforcing member has cross-sectional area which is greater than a
cross-sectional area of said cavity.
25. An aerial optical cable as claimed in claim 23, further comprising a
water absorbent material disposed in said cavity and surrounding said
optical fiber.
26. An aerial optical cable as claimed in claim 25, wherein said water
absorbent material comprising one of polyacrylates with carboxylate
functional groups, partially neutralized polyacrylic acid, and
polyacrylamides, or copolymers of polyacrylates with carboxylate
functional groups, partially neutralized polyacrylic acid, or
polyacrylamides.
27. An aerial optical cable as claimed in claim 23, further comprising a
gel material is disposed in said cavity and surrounding said optical
fiber.
28. An aerial optical cable as claimed in claim 27, wherein said gel
material comprises at least one silicone, mineral, polyolefin, and a
polyol oils combined with a polymeric thixotropy modifier of pyrogenic
silica.
29. An aerial optical cabyle as claimed in claim 23, wherein said jacket
body comprises a plastic material that does not contain phthalate
platicizers which can migrate to a coating of said optical fiber.
30. An aerial optical cable as claimed in claim 29, wherein said plastic
material comprises one of polyvinyl chloride, polyethelene and
polypropolyene, or a copolymer comprising polyethelene and polypropolyene.
31. An aerial optical cable as claimed in claim 23, wherein said
reinforcing member comprises a plurality of polybenzoxazole fibers.
32. An aerial optical cable as claimed in claim 23, wherein said optical
fiber has an excess fiber length of 0.0 to 0.5%.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to an aerial drop cable with reduced weight
and improved specific strength. In particular, the present invention
relates to an optical fiber aerial drop cable including reinforcement
strength members containing high modulus materials such as
poly(p-phenylene-2,6-bezobisoxazole) or carbon fibers disposed on
opposites sides of a central cavity containing one or more loose optical
fibers wherein the strength members protect the optical fibers from
compressive loads.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
With the advent of new technologies and lower prices, the introduction of
fiber optic installation in residential homes or "Fiber-To-The-Home"
(FTTH) is coming closer to reality. In a passive optical network, small
optical cables containing only a few fibers will be deployed directly onto
customer premises for providing video, data and voice connections with
superior quality and bandwidth. The optical cables need to be designed
with appropriate materials so that long term fiber and cable reliability
are obtained at a cost that is acceptable for the distribution market.
Conventional copper cables have limited data transmission bandwidth and are
subject to electromagnetic interference. Conventional optical fiber cables
are designed for different applications and thus, do not have the features
which are required for FTTH applications such as compatibility with
existing hardware, self-support over large distances, and low
flammability. In the past, plastic compounds which are typically used in
copper drop cables have not been selected to ensure reliability for fiber
optic telecommunication cables. For example, the carbon black content and
U.V. absorption requirements for copper drop cables are far lower than the
requirements for fiber optic cables. Polyvinyl chloride (PVC) jacketing
compounds for copper drop cables contain only 0.5% carbon black by weight,
whereas Bellcore GR-20 Issue 2 standards require 2.6%.+-.0.25% carbon
black and an ultraviolet (U.V.) absorption coefficient of at least 400 at
375 nm. A high U.V. absorption coefficient is required to ensure U.V.
resistance and a long service lifetime for the more expensive fiber optic
cables and to protect light sensitive fibers from U.V. radiation when thin
jackets are used. Additionally, materials that are non-reactive with
optical fiber performance and/or fiber coating reliability must be
selected. Use of traditional phthalate plasticized PVC materials can
result in plasticizer migration to the fiber coatings which can result in
a decrease in coating adhesion (as measured by coating strip force) and
possible coating delamination resulting in catastrophic fiber failure.
Unlike copper drop cables, the presence of water and hydrogen in fiber
optic drop cables is a significant concern. In particular, the presence of
water or hydrogen in fiber optic drop cables can result in attenuation
increases. Therefore, the fiber optic drop cables must be designed to
prevent water ingression into the cable and the fiber optic drop cables
must utilize materials that do not generate or release hydrogen.
Conventional aerial drop cables may be reinforced by metallic materials
such as steel or copper, or non-conductive materials such as carbon
fibers, aramid fibers, or glass reinforced epoxy rods. For example, U.S.
Pat. No. 4,199,225 discloses an optical cable which utilizes a pair of
steel or carbon fiber reinforcing wires disposed on opposite sides of a
bore housing optical fibers in order to provide longitudinal support and
protection against a crushing force applied to the optical cable. U.S.
Pat. No. 4,199,225 discloses an optical cable which utilizes a pair of
reinforcing members such as steel wire or carbon fiber disposed on
opposite sides of a bore housing optical fibers in order to provide
longitudinal support and protection against a crushing force applied to
the optical cable. U.S. Pat. No. 5,673,352 discloses a fiber optic micro
cable which includes reinforcing members manufactured of metal wire or
non-conductive materials such as fiberglass, reinforced plastic or other
dielectric materials. Similarly, U.S. Pat. No. 4,761,053 discloses an
aerial service wire which utilizes a pair of strength members composed of
a fibrous stranded material such as fiberglass or aramid fibers which are
impregnated with a plastic material.
Aramid reinforced rods provide a high modulus and tenacity (e.g.,
Kevlar.RTM. aramid fiber manufactured by Du Pont Corporation has a modulus
of 120 GPa and a tenacity of 24 g/D). Although aramid fibers are
relatively expensive, aramid reinforced rods provide a higher modulus and
lower weight than glass reinforced rods. Currently, aramid is the highest
specific modulus material which is commercially available and utilized for
reinforcement of composite strength members in dielectric cables.
The self-support span length of an aerial drop cable is very sensitive to
the size and weight of the cable. As a result, attempts to achieve a
longer span length by increasing the size of a reinforcement member (e.g.,
glass reinforced epoxy) may be compromised by increases in the cable
weight and size. In particular, conventional cable materials may have a
density greater than 1.2 g/cc which requires the use of heavier
reinforcing members due to the higher cable weight. Moreover, the higher
density increases the overall cable weight and cost and decreases cable
flexibility. Accordingly, in order to maintain the cable elongation in a
limited range, which is critical for fiber long term reliability, the only
way to achieve long span requirements is by using higher modulus materials
in the reinforcing members.
In view of the disadvantages of conventional aerial drop cables, it is an
object of the present invention to provide an aerial drop cable using all
dielectric components with reduced weight and size in order to increase
span length and decrease ice and wind loading.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide an aerial drop
cable with reduced bending strain for improved cable routability.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention is adapted to achieve the foregoing objects. In
accomplishing these objects, the present invention provides an aerial drop
cable comprising a jacket surrounding a cavity containing a least one
loosely housed optical fiber and a pair of reinforcing members composed of
a high modulus material.
According to the present invention, the jacket comprises a central portion
in which the cavity is disposed and two end portions in which the
reinforcing members are disposed. In order to protect the optical fiber
within the cavity from lateral compressive forces, the vertical thickness
of the central portion of the cavity is smaller than the vertical
thickness of the end portions and the cross-sectional area of the
reinforcing members is larger than the cross-sectional area of the central
cavity. As a result, when a lateral compressive force is applied to the
aerial drop cable, the compressive force is absorbed by the end portions
of the jacket and the reinforcing members. Further, by loosely housing the
optical fiber in the cavity, the optical fiber is provided with freedom of
movement and thus, is less prone to the bending losses introduced by
stresses imposed on the cable in an outside environment.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the
reinforcing members are composed of polybenzoxazole (PBO) fibers. As a
result, the diameter of the PBO reinforcing members is reduced as compared
with conventional reinforcing members composed of aramid, metal or glass
thereby providing a substantial reduction in the amount of jacketing
material and the weight of the cable. Further, the bending strain of the
cable utilizing PBO reinforcing members is substantially reduced for an
equivalent bending radius as compared with cables utilizing conventional
reinforcing members due to the smaller diameter of the reinforcing
members- Therefore, the bending radius of the cable is reduced providing
greater flexibility for routing the cable indoors.
The above and other features of the invention including various and novel
details of construction will now be more particularly described with
reference to the accompanying drawing and pointed out in the claims. It
will be understood that the particular aerial drop cable embodying the
present invention is shown by way of illustration only and not as a
limitation of the invention. The principles and features of this invention
may be employed in varied and numerous embodiments without departing from
the scope of the invention.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
These and other features, aspects and advantages of the present invention
will become better understood with reference to the following detailed
description, appended claims, and accompanying drawing, wherein:
FIG. 1 illustrates a cross-sectional view of the aerial drop cable.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
Referring to FIG. 1, an optical fiber aerial drop cable in accordance with
a preferred embodiment of the present invention will be described. The
aerial drop cable 100 comprises a jacket 10, a pair of reinforcement
members 20, an optical fiber cavity 30, and one or more optical fibers 40
which are loosely housed in the optical fiber cavity 30. The jacket 10
includes a central portion 60 in which the optical fiber cavity 30 is
disposed and two end portions 70 in which the reinforcing members 20 are
respectively disposed. In particular, the optical fiber cavity 30 is
centrally positioned between the reinforcing members 20 and extends in a
longitudinal direction of the cable 100. In order to protect the optical
fibers 40 from lateral compressive forces, the thickness of the central
portion 60 in the vertical direction is smaller than the. thickness of the
end portions 70. Further, the reinforcement members 20 have a larger
diameter than the optical fiber cavity 10 so that when a lateral
compressive force is applied to the cable 100 the compressive force is
concentrated first to the reinforcing members 20 rather than the optical
fibers 40 in the optical fiber cavity 30. In other words, when viewed in a
transverse cross section, the cross-sectional area of the reinforcing
members 20 and the end portions 70 of the jacket are larger than the cross
sectional area of the optical fiber cavity 10 and the central portion 60
of the jacket, respectively, so that the overall cross section of the
cable 50 has a "dog bone" shape. Since external compressive forces are
initially distributed to the end portions 70 and the reinforcing members
20,the compressive force applied to the optical fibers 40 housed in the
optical fiber cavity 30 is minimized thereby protecting the optical fiber
40 from lateral compressive loads which are inevitable when using existing
hardware to anchor the cable 100 during installation.
The cable 100 is formed using a minimum number of materials and components
in order to reduce the weight and size. In particular, the jacket 10 is
formed using a plastic material, e.g., polyvinyl chloride (PVC),
polyethelene or polypropolyene, or copolymer thereof which does not
contain platicizers which can migrate to the fiber coatings thereby
reducing reliability and coating adhesion. Further, in the preferred
embodiment, the material of the jacket 10 may be optimized by using
cellular materials to reduce overall jacket density. The jacket 10 has
material density which is less than or equal to 1.2 g/cc, an ultraviolet
absorption coefficient of greater than 400 at 375 nm, a carbon black
content greater than 2.3%, and a flammability requirement of VW-1 or
greater.
The optical fibers 40 are loosely housed in the optical fiber cavity 30
without the use of buffer tube or support member so that the optical
fibers 40 can move independently of each other. While the use of buffering
material may provide additional protection to the fibers, it also
increases the cable cost because of the additional materials and the
manufacturing process of a buffered cable structure will require more
equipment or multiple processing steps. The aerial drop cable of the
present invention eliminates any unnecessary layers of extra protection
and process steps to simplify the cable process and, reduce costs.
Further, single mode fibers and different types of NZDS fibers are
commonly used with longer transmission signal wavelength and provide
higher bandwidth/dispersion performances. However, these fibers are more
sensitive to macrobending and microbending losses. The loosely buffered
design of the present invention provides the optical fibers 40 with more
freedom of movement and thus, is less prone to the single losses
introduced by stresses imposed on the aerial drop cable 100 in an outside
environment.
In accordance with the preferred embodiment of the present invention, the
aerial drop cable 100 has an excess fiber length (i.e., [(fiber
length-cable length)/cable length] .times.100) of 0.0 to 0.5% in order to
provide fiber long-term reliability, and quality cable transmission
performances under cold temperatures in an outside environment. Due to the
characteristics of the aerial application, the aerial drop cable will
elongate due to gravity effect and this effect will be enlarged by wind
and ice load in addition to the actual cable weight. If the cable designed
with no or negative EFL, (negative meaning fiber is shorter than cable,
and thus stretched from beginning) due to the elongation aerial cable will
experience, the fiber will be under constant tensile stress and strain. If
this load or strain is larger than a critical value (GR 20 recommend
<0.2% long-term fiber strain), the fiber will break before specified
service life, causing a reliability issue. With an EFL of 0 to 0.5%, the
fiber 40 housed in the cavity 30 will initially try to straighten out to
exhaust EFL during cable elongation before the fiber 40 is subject to
strain. This will reduce the fiber strain level under same amount of cable
elongation, thus enhancing the fiber reliability. On the other hand,
however, too much EFL designed into the cable is not a good thing either.
The fiber accommodates EFL in the loose buffered cable by curling into- a
helical or sinusoidal shape of path, introducing fiber bending. When fiber
bending reaches certain level, the light signal will escape from the fiber
waveguide at the bending location and cause signal loss. During a cable's
service life, it will experience wide range of temperature variations (-50
C .about.+70 C). The extreme cold temperature will cause cable to contract
and increase the degree of fiber bending. If the cable has a large EFL,
the high level of bending (worsened by cold temperature cable contraction)
will increase the signal losses high enough to encumber regular network
transmissions. Further, a large EFL is not economical since excess fiber
increases cost. Accordingly, an optimized EFL range should be applied to
obtain the best results for both product performance and economics.
In order to prevent water ingression in the optical fiber cavity 30, a
material 80 such as a blocking gel or a superabsorbent material in the
form of a tape, power or yarn may be added to the optical fiber cavity,
30. Examples of superabsorbent materials are polyacrylates with
carboxylate functional groups, partially neutralized polyacrylic acid,
polyamides, or copolymers thereof, e.g., a copolymer of acrylic acid and
sodium acrylate. The reinforcing members 30 and cross-sectional profile
provide protection to the optical fibers 40 against lateral compressive
forces and are thus, compatible to the clamping type hardware presently
utilized for copper drop wires. The cable design of the present invention
maximizes the efficiency of the material usage so the cable is light in
weight and small in size. The cable weight and size are critical factors
to reduce ice and wind loading in aerial application in terms of sag and
tension of the installed cables.
In accordance with the preferred embodiment of the present invention the
reinforcing members 20 are manufactured using
Poly(p-phenylene-2,6-bezobisoxazole) or polybenzoxazole (PBO) fibers. PBO
fibers are manufactured under the trade-name of Zylon.RTM. by Toyobo Co.
Ltd. PBO has a typical modulus of 270 GPa and a tenacity as high as 42
g/D. The specific modulus of PBO is 2.07 times greater than aramid thereby
allowing reduced cable weight and increased span length. The use of
stronger reinforcing materials also allows easier production since fewer
yarn ends are required in the manufacture of a particular cable design. By
utilizing PBO fibers, the diameter of the reinforcing members 20 is 50%
smaller than an equivalent aramid rod. Materials with a high modulus
(>200 GPa) and low density (<2.0 g/cc) such as PBO or carbon fibers
are desired to achieve optimal span length.
Since the reinforcing members 20 are the largest components of the aerial
drop cable, the reduction in the diameter of the reinforcing members 20 by
utilizing PBO or carbon reinforced rods results in a substantial reduction
in the amount of jacketing material and cable weight. Further, the bending
strain of the cable utilizing smaller diameter reinforcing elements with a
modulus above 200 GPa is substantially reduced for an equivalent bending
radius as compared with cables utilizing conventional reinforcing members
due to the smaller diameter of the reinforcing members. Therefore, the
bending radius of the cable will be reduced providing greater flexibility
for routing the cable indoors. Lastly, the inherent flame retardancy of
PBO ensures good flame retardancy for the cable.
Table 1 below illustrates the different characteristics reinforcing members
of conventional materials and PBO in dielectric self-support aerial drop
cables, wherein the reinforcing member have a diameter of 1.8 mm. Table 2
provides a comparison among rigid reinforcing members made of different
type of materials based on the characteristics listed in Table 1. Cables
made of different types reinforcing members, but at same size (diameter),
are compared with regards to the cable weights and maximum servicing spans
(span: the distance between two poles where the cable is self-supporting)
the cable is capable of under the different NESC loading conditions
(light, medium and heavy). In particular, Table 2 shows the percentage
increase of weight (i.e., (weight of material 1-weight of material 2)/
weight of material 1) and maximum spans between PBO and other conventional
materials (i.e., (span of material 1-span of material 2)/span of material
1).
TABLE 1
Cable span under different
N.E.S.C. loading
conditions (Meters)
Light Medium Heavy
Reinforcing Cable weight loading loading loading
member material (kg/km) conditions conditions conditions
Glass reinforced 28.7 75 43 23
epoxy (GRP)
Aramid 23.4 96 55 29
Reinforced Rod
PBO Reinforced 25.6 260 148 80
Rod
Carbon Fiber 27.4 179 103 57
Rod (CFR)
TABLE 2
Cable weight Capable span increase % change
% increase Light Medium Heavy
Reinforcing over loading loading loading
member material base conditions conditions conditions
CFR vs. Aramid 17.09% 86.5% 87.3% 96.6%
CFR vs. GRP -4.53% 139% 140% 148%
PBO vs. Aramid 2.99% 134% 135% 145%
PBO vs. GRP -10.80% 150% 200% 208%
Because the design of aerial drop cable of the present invention utilizes
optical fibers without buffer tubes or a buffer coat on the optical
fibers, the cable may be manufactured using a single-step process from pay
off of the optical fibers thereby providing the advantages of increased
speed and efficiency, and low manufacture cost. The aerial drop cable of
the present invention can be flexibly designed to meet different
self-support spans and various loading requirements. The high modulus
reinforcement members can be included as composite rods or in some
combination of composite rods and yarns.
In accordance with the preferred embodiment of the present invention, the
aerial drop 15 cable should conform to the requirements of Telcordia
GR-20-CORE Genereic Requirements for Optical Fiber and Fiber Optic Cable,
GR 409 Generic Requirements for Premises Fiber Optic Cable, GR 421 Generic
Requirements for Metallic Telecommunication Cable, GR 492 421 Generic
Requirements for Metallic Telecommunication Wire, IEEE Standard P1222
(draft), NFPA National Electrical Code, IEEE National Electrical Safety
Code, and UL 1581 flammability requirement. In the preferred embodiment,
the cable cross-section has a thickness which is less than or equal to
0.14 inches and a width which is less than or equal to 0.352 inches. The
thickness of the jacket is less than 0.016 inches external to the
reinforcing members 20 and less than or equal to 0.22 inches between the
optical fiber cavity 30 and the reinforcing members 20. The nominal cable
weight is 24.5 pounds per 1000 feet and have minimum bend radius of 4.5
inches under no load and 8.0 inches under load.
Although certain preferred embodiments of the present invention have been
described, the spirit and scope of the invention is by no means restricted
to what is described above.
* * * * *