From: schuldy@math.harvard.edu (Mark Schuldenfrei)
Message-Id: <9401181817.AA12364@math.harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: Principality Meeting
To: dagoura@MIT.EDU
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 1994 13:16:59 -0500 (EST)
Cc: carolingia@bloom-beacon.MIT.EDU
In-Reply-To: <9401181659.AA18407@al-burro.MIT.EDU> from "dagoura@MIT.EDU" at Jan 18, 94 11:59:40 am
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 1254      

  But I am not deeply attached to these beliefs, and might well be
  convinced otherwise.  I would certainly  be interested in hearing not
  only other views but other options.  I would like to know, Tibor, what
  you think the benefit of a Central Region Principality would be.

Tibicen, yup you asked for it.

I believe that the local groups of the Central Region, more or less, play
together very well, and have an excellent relationship. I would like to see
us recognize that relationship, and formalize it.

I have no strong urge to see more awards or orders, or more events. I just
think we could form a pretty good group, and do more good things together
with a Principality than without.

Just for the record, here is what I would expect to see if I got my perfect
wish:

 ?Glenn Linn?                                                      Endewearde
                     S. Mt. Freehold     S. Stonemarche          Malagentia
  Concordia          Bergental           Quintavia          Carolingia
                        BBM                                    Smoking Rocks
?Northpass?       ?Dragonship?                                    Bridge

Comments? Did I inadvertently leave anybody out, or include in somebody I
shouldn't have?

	Tibor