From: schuldy@math.harvard.edu (Mark Schuldenfrei)
Message-Id: <9401191916.AA00546@math.harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: jumping into the fray...
To: JAP@LASPAU.mhs.harvard.edu
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 1994 14:16:41 -0500 (EST)
Cc: carolingia@bloom-beacon.mit.edu
In-Reply-To: <20783D2D0136CDD1*@SMF> from "JAP@LASPAU.mhs.harvard.edu" at Jan 19, 94 01:12:41 pm
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 1042      

Siubjan wrote:
  So what exactly is the Central Region Principality idea?  Was it invented 
  simply to capitulate those who wanted to split off from the East, but 
  didn't want to be (or weren't wanted) in the Northern Region 
  Principality?  I myself prefer the idea of Carolingia belonging in a 
  Central Principality, because I don't see that we have much cohesion with 
  the Northern groups.

Well, I was far from the first, but I am certainly among the most recent to
have started a push for a more MA based principality. I simply see us
getting along well, and having a real identity. So, I guess, blame me.
  
  Ya know, I sincerely hope that if any of these principalities are formed, 
  they come up with less clinical sounding names. ;-}

Start the ball rolling! I know that some people refer to the Northern
movement as Vinland (for good and bad reasons).  What would you name a
central based principality?  No, guys, seriously.  I remember that someone
made a lovely suggestion once, but I forget who or what it was.

	Tibor