Received: from ATHENA-AS-WELL.MIT.EDU by po6.MIT.EDU (5.61/4.7) id AA13865; Wed, 19 Jan 94 16:54:44 EST
Received: from BLOOM-BEACON.MIT.EDU by MIT.EDU with SMTP
	id AA12839; Wed, 19 Jan 94 16:54:24 EST
Received:  by bloom-beacon.mit.edu (5.61/25-eef)
	id AA26690; Wed, 19 Jan 94 16:49:17 EST
Received: from inet-gw-2.pa.dec.com by bloom-beacon.mit.edu with SMTP (5.61/25-eef)
	id AA26642; Wed, 19 Jan 94 16:49:08 EST
Received: from us2rmc.bb.dec.com by inet-gw-2.pa.dec.com (5.65/13Jan94)
	id AA01552; Wed, 19 Jan 94 13:43:29 -0800
Received: by us2rmc.bb.dec.com; id AA16859; Wed, 19 Jan 94 16:40:38 -0500
Message-Id: <9401192140.AA16859@us2rmc.bb.dec.com>
Received: from epee.enet; by us2rmc.enet; Wed, 19 Jan 94 16:40:39 EST
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 94 16:40:39 EST
From: touche!  19-Jan-1994 1646 <groff@epee.enet.dec.com>
To: justin@dsd.camb.inmet.com
Cc: carolingia@bloom-beacon.mit.edu, groff@epee.enet.dec.com
Apparently-To: carolingia@bloom-beacon.mit.edu, justin@dsd.camb.inmet.com
Subject: RE: Principality

>True. On the other hand, as I mentioned before, I probably get to NJ
>alone as much as I do everything north of us. It really varies quite a
>bit from person to person.

You have family and a built-in-crash space there, right?

>>At EKU, except for the King, all the "visitors" where from Carolingia.  Given
>>Carolingia's reputation for travelling, I found this to be amusing.
>
>Indeed, but I think any reasonable person would concede that that
>reputation is a dinosaur at this point. There was a point (not even
>all that long ago) when Carolingians were isolationist as a rule,
>but I really don't think that's the case any more. However, there
>really doesn't seem to be all that much consistency to *where* we
>travel...

A recent report from a fencing MAL complained that Carolingian fencers do not
travel enough.  There was an implied "isolationist" tone to the statement.  I
do not think this reputation has left us!  I am not sure that I disagree with
the MAL, either.

-Danulf
