Received: from ATHENA-AS-WELL.MIT.EDU by po6.MIT.EDU (5.61/4.7) id AA27794; Fri, 11 Mar 94 15:54:39 EST
Received: from BLOOM-BEACON.MIT.EDU by MIT.EDU with SMTP
	id AA23234; Fri, 11 Mar 94 15:54:31 EST
Received:  by bloom-beacon.mit.edu (5.61/25-eef)
	id AA13836; Fri, 11 Mar 94 15:46:36 EST
Received: from ATHENA-AS-WELL.MIT.EDU by bloom-beacon.mit.edu with SMTP (5.61/25-eef)
	id AA13822; Fri, 11 Mar 94 15:46:31 EST
Received: from OLIVER.MIT.EDU by MIT.EDU with SMTP
	id AA22547; Fri, 11 Mar 94 15:46:28 EST
From: dagoura@MIT.EDU
Received: by oliver.MIT.EDU (AIX 3.2/UCB 5.64/4.7) id AA19233; Fri, 11 Mar 1994 15:46:27 -0500
Message-Id: <9403112046.AA19233@oliver.MIT.EDU>
To: schuldy@zariski.harvard.edu
Cc: carolingia@bloom-beacon.MIT.EDU
Subject: RE: Re: A Plot to keep our burough "members"
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 94 15:46:27 EST


Tibor wrote:

>This sort of thing goes on all the time, Tibicen. It is part of fealty, and
>our recreation.  What is the benefit of "organizing" it?

I specifically said NON-FEALTY.  You quoted my original message in
your reply:

  Apprenticeships would be of very limited length (say one semester),
  and wouldn't conotate the kind of personal, fealty relationship
  demoiselling does (though it would be a contract).

I certainly haven't seen YOU offer to take on a brand-new-hasn't-made-
garb-yet-freshman as a personal student in either heraldry and
cooking.  So if "this sort of thing" is going on all the time, just
who's doing it?  

Tibor, perhaps I was not clear in what I wrote, which describes
something of significantly different character and terms than either
the extremely informal "if you have a question, ask me" or the "heavy"
tradition of equerry/demoiselle; it addresses concerns regarding new
people for which fealty is inappropriate and the current informal
situation is apparently inadequate.  I would suggest you re-read it,
and if you have specific questions then, do drop me a line.

--Tibicen
