Received: from ATHENA-AS-WELL.MIT.EDU by po6.MIT.EDU (5.61/4.7) id AA28646; Tue, 29 Mar 94 14:02:42 EST
Received: from BLOOM-BEACON.MIT.EDU by MIT.EDU with SMTP
	id AA13677; Tue, 29 Mar 94 14:02:35 EST
Received:  by bloom-beacon.mit.edu (5.61/25-eef)
	id AA23347; Tue, 29 Mar 94 13:50:59 EST
Received: from math.harvard.edu by bloom-beacon.mit.edu with SMTP (5.61/25-eef)
	id AA23320; Tue, 29 Mar 94 13:50:55 EST
From: schuldy@zariski.harvard.edu (Mark Schuldenfrei)
Message-Id: <9403291849.AA15578@math.harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: Avoiding flammage
To: sommerfeld@apollo.hp.com (Bill Sommerfeld)
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 1994 13:49:23 -0500 (EST)
Cc: carolingia@bloom-beacon.mit.edu (carolingia)
In-Reply-To: <9403291811.AA12961@bloom-beacon.mit.edu> from "Bill Sommerfeld" at Mar 29, 94 01:11:19 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL21]
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 849       

  Due to time constraints on my part, this is not likely to happen very
  soon, but it could happen if the general consensus of the list is that
  this would be a good idea.  If the membership of the list is
  *overwhelmingly* in favor of this, I'd be inclined to do this.

I have suggested to folks that they broadcast the carolingia mailing list
when they are coming to Boston, or something like that.  To eliminate
posting ability before becoming a subscriber would reduce that utility, and
in addition make us kind of clannish.  Unless the bounce message contained
an email address for an active subscriber that was willing to act as filter
and gateway, or, Bill, if you were willing to process short term onand off
requests very quickly, I would be very against it.

But what do I know, I get close to 100 email messages a day, anyway.

	Tibor
