Received: from MIT.MIT.EDU by po6.MIT.EDU (5.61/4.7) id AA26883; Mon, 28 Feb 94 10:08:16 EST
Received: from ASTRON.MIT.EDU by MIT.EDU with SMTP
	id AA18883; Mon, 28 Feb 94 10:07:55 EST
Received: by astron.mit.edu (5.65/DEC-Ultrix/4.3)
	id AA24545; Mon, 28 Feb 1994 10:08:48 -0500
Message-Id: <9402281508.AA24545@astron.mit.edu>
To: dmchamb@MIT.EDU
Cc: mitgaard@MIT.EDU
Subject: Re: This week's meeting and BoD stuff 
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 27 Feb 94 16:01:44 EST."
             <9402272101.AA21584@pesto.MIT.EDU> 
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 94 10:08:48 -0500
From: mcdonald@astron.mit.edu
X-Mts: smtp


An additional note about the replies to the Royalty:  I believe that
these would be accepted by Lady Eowyn for postage by the Barony.  Remember
that Kobayashi decided that the Barony would supply postage for letters
to the Crown or the Board on the recent decisions.  I think that these
replies to the Crown's inquiry legitimately fall into this category.
Eowyn will probably be at dance practice and will definitely be at
the Council meeting next week.  And remember that the deadline for giving
letters to Eowyn for Baronial postage is next Monday during the Council
meeting.

I will be going to dance practice after the borough meeting, so I could
take them to Eowyn if people want the Barony to supply postage.  Remember
the rules posted previously about this; the letters have to be addressed,
with return address, and should be sealed.

					Stefan Skywatcher
					mcdonald@mit.edu
