Message-Id: <9403140720.AA07813@bloom-beacon.mit.edu>
From: hablutzelml@attmail.com (Margo Lynn Hablutzel )
Date: 14 Mar 94 06:29:51 GMT
To: hablutzelml@attmail.com (Margo Lynn Hablutzel ), antir@kwantlen.bc.ca,
        sca-west@ecst.csuchico.edu, carolingia@bloom-beacon.mit.edu,
        calontir@unl.edu, nordmark@ludd.luth.se, northshield@stolaf.edu,
        e5@uriacc.uri.edu, sca-reform@MIT.EDU, jaymin@maths.tcd.ie,
        lgrant@lanczos.matha.tcd.ie, rgoff@mcimail.com,
        71233.3035@compuserve.com, MMS6824@tntech.edu
Phone: +1 312 220 9140
Fax-Phone: +1 312 220 9261
Subject: Further Clarification -- Please Read ALL Words!!!
In-Reply-To: your message <hablutzelml0721626130> of Sun Mar 13 11:26:13 CDT 1994
Content-Type: text

Apparently people have been reacting to my posting of this
morning without reading it fully.  In discussing the
impeachment petitions, I clearly said: 

	>> I also stand by what I said about the impeachment
	>> petitions.  * * *  There has been no response to the
	>> "Estrella Proclamation," and the deadline for that has
	>> not yet passed.  Why not suspend the impeachment
	>> petitions until we have the answer?  It's only a week.

Yet Hossein wrote:

	>> I point out that, contrary to Morgan Cely Cain's
	>> implication, the impeachment petitions do not even
	>> mention the new directors.  They only name the _old_
	>> directors, who were sufficiently "up to speed" to have
	>> enacted the policies of January 22 in the first place.
	>> The call to suspend circulation of petitions is
	>> predicated on a false assumption. 

No, it is not.  I am fully aware that the petitions name only
the old Board members, three of whom have resigned of their
own accord.  If you had read my earlier posting, it suggests
that we refrain from continuing until the date for the
"Estrella Proclamation" has passed, to give the Board members
-- especially the old ones -- the opportunity to show that
they have heeded the words of the Crowns and of the Populace.


Bertram then wrote, in response to my first response to
Hossein, in which I suggested that we offer the Board members
the opportunity for apology:

	>> I'm puzzled.  Haven't they had plenty of
	>> opportunities, in writing and in person, to apologize?
	>> Not being picky, but there's no reason for them to
	>> have to wait until the Board meeting to apologize,

As I had stated, I am asking only that we wait until the
deadline for the "Estrella Proclamation" -- NOT, emphatically
NOT until the April Board Meeting!  I didn't think another
week (or ten days?) was too long to wait -- am I wrong?

					---=  Morgan Cely Cain *


* remembering that Patience is a virtue.....