Received: from ATHENA-AS-WELL.MIT.EDU by po6.MIT.EDU (5.61/4.7) id AA19670; Tue, 15 Mar 94 14:59:11 EST Received: from BLOOM-BEACON.MIT.EDU by MIT.EDU with SMTP id AA03264; Tue, 15 Mar 94 14:59:06 EST Received: by bloom-beacon.mit.edu (5.61/25-eef) id AA20458; Tue, 15 Mar 94 14:57:28 EST Received: from nak.Berkeley.EDU by bloom-beacon.mit.edu with SMTP (5.61/25-eef) id AA20432; Tue, 15 Mar 94 14:57:23 EST Received: from [128.32.144.118] by nak.berkeley.edu (8.6.4/1.40) id LAA04579; Tue, 15 Mar 1994 11:56:10 -0800 X-Nupop-Charset: English Date: Tue, 15 Mar 1994 11:45:50 -0800 (PST) From: "Flieg Hollander" Sender: flieg@garnet.berkeley.edu Reply-To: flieg@garnet.berkeley.edu Message-Id: <42382.flieg@garnet.berkeley.edu> To: greg.dearborn@analog.com, antir@Kwantlen.BC.CA, calontir@unl.edu, carolingia@bloom-beacon.mit.edu, e5@uriacc.uri.edu, nordmark@ludd.luth.se, north@bransle.ucs.mun.ca, northshield@stolaf.edu, sca-reform@MIT.EDU, sca-west@ecst.csuchico.edu Subject: RE: Hate Mail Frederick here -=- Gareth of Stonemarche wrote: > > A close friend of mine who spent some time with Randall Tatro > this weekend shared some news with me. Randall told her that he has been > getting "hate mail." > Please allow me to second the response of Master Arval, and to hope that it is the response of everyone within sight of these words. I have a deep and profound reaction to the actions of the Board. I have been fighting this fight for many years. I have written scurrilous songs, even, and certainly argued loud and long with more than one member of the Board. However, while I can imagine hating one or more Board members, I cannot imagine writing a letter which was not at least overtly polite. Hate mail is _not_ acceptable in this cause. *grump* --Frederick , , * * * Frederick of Holland, MSCA, OP, etc. *** *** *** flieg@garnet.berkeley.edu _|___|___|_ On Bitnet, try: flieg@ucbgarne |===========| (((Flieg Hollander, Chem. Dept., U.C. Berkeley))) ================== Old Used Duke =================