Received: from ATHENA-AS-WELL.MIT.EDU by po6.MIT.EDU (5.61/4.7) id AA03653; Tue, 18 Jan 94 13:53:15 EST
Received: from BLOOM-BEACON.MIT.EDU by MIT.EDU with SMTP
	id AA16112; Tue, 18 Jan 94 13:53:02 EST
Received:  by bloom-beacon.mit.edu (5.61/25-eef)
	id AA09891; Tue, 18 Jan 94 13:44:11 EST
Received: from HULK.DMC.COM by bloom-beacon.mit.edu with SMTP (5.61/25-eef)
	id AA09875; Tue, 18 Jan 94 13:44:06 EST
Received: from accint.accint.com by DMC.COM (MX V3.3 VAX) with UUCP; Tue, 18
          Jan 1994 12:45:12 EST
Received: by accint.com (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA05677; Tue, 18 Jan 94 12:00:58 EST
Message-Id: <9401181700.AA05677@accint.com>
To: carolingia@bloom-beacon.mit.edu
Subject: Re: Principality Debate
In-Reply-To: Your message of Tue, 18 Jan 94 10:39:25 -0500.
    <9401181539.AA11794@bolognese.MIT.EDU>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 94 12:00:50 EST
From: jrp@accint.com


What are the tenets of the opposition toward the creation of
a Principality? Is it just the conservative/leave-well-enough-alone
types, or something more substantive? I also hadn't heard there 
was any significant opposition.

Johann

--
Jason R. Pascucci			Email: jrp@accint.com
Open Systems Engineer			Phone: 617-494-0066x317
Access International			432 Columbia St, Cambridge, MA 02141