Received: from ATHENA-AS-WELL.MIT.EDU by po6.MIT.EDU (5.61/4.7) id AA09486; Wed, 19 Jan 94 16:12:56 EST
Received: from BLOOM-BEACON.MIT.EDU by MIT.EDU with SMTP
	id AA09202; Wed, 19 Jan 94 16:12:34 EST
Received:  by bloom-beacon.mit.edu (5.61/25-eef)
	id AA11829; Wed, 19 Jan 94 15:53:11 EST
Received: from welch.ncd.com by bloom-beacon.mit.edu with SMTP (5.61/25-eef)
	id AA11794; Wed, 19 Jan 94 15:53:06 EST
Received: from bryant.ncd.com (cynthia@bryant.ncd.com [192.43.159.209]) by welch.ncd.com (8.6.5/8.6.4) with ESMTP id MAA05527 for <carolingia@bloom-beacon.mit.edu>; Wed, 19 Jan 1994 12:52:54 -0800
Received: from localhost (cynthia@localhost) by bryant.ncd.com (8.6.5/8.6.5.Beta11) id MAA22931 for carolingia@bloom-beacon.mit.edu; Wed, 19 Jan 1994 12:53:08 -0800
From: cynthia@ncd.com (Cynthia Virtue)
Message-Id: <9401191253.ZM22929@bryant.ncd.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 1994 12:53:07 -0800
In-Reply-To: schuldy@math.harvard.edu (Mark Schuldenfrei)
        "Re: Principality" (Jan 19,  3:20pm)
References: <9401192020.AA01846@math.harvard.edu>
X-Mailer: Z-Mail (2.1.5 09aug93)
To: carolingia@bloom-beacon.mit.edu
Subject: Re: Principality


In the last convulsion of principality-discussion that I remember before I
left, I heard a heartfelt reason from I-don't-remember-who regarding why
they were in support of the principality movement, despite its flaws.

 "If we don't go principality, everyone else will, and then they'll go
kingdom, and we'll be the only ones left. We must beat them to it."

Although this sentiment is self-interested in the extreme, it does suggest
a solution for those who A: love the East and its traditions B: don't feel
cohesive enough with any other group to get in the principality bed with
them, or C: wish the issue would go away.

Cynthia


-- 
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Cynthia Virtue					cynthia@ncd.com
Network Computing Devices			Tel: 415-694-0690
Mountain View, California, USA			Fax: 415-961-6958
CAUTION: The mass of this product contains the energy equivalent 
  of 85 million tons of TNT per net ounce of weight.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
