From: case1@husc.harvard.edu
Message-Id: <9402231912.AA14207@husc4.harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: Article in _Globe_
To: huff@funk.com
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 1994 14:12:45 -0500 (EST)
Cc: carolingia@bloom-beacon.mit.edu
In-Reply-To: <9402231806.AA23038@uu2.psi.com> from "Robert Huff" at Feb 23, 94 01:06:15 pm
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 1538      

> 
> Hello:
> 	The archery folks should read the article on page 20 (dead
> center; "Crossbow restrictions proposed")of the Feb 23 _Globe_.
> Someone's filed a bill to make carrying a crossbow illegal ....
> 
> 					Diego Mundoz
> 
Gee, why am I not surprised.  Why don't we make killing someone with a 
crossbow illegal!  WHAT?  You say killing someone with a crossbow is ALREADY
illegal?  Then, obviously, this whole incident could not have happened and
is made up out of whole cloth by the media.

But seriously folks,  the possession of a crossbow is already governed by the
same laws that apply to rifles and shotguns.  (Actually, it is a bit of a
gray area, but you better have the licence.)  Without being in possession of
any more facts than the media/police will give, I can only say that:

1-If the crossbow was loaded and cocked (as seems likely) this is a violation
of existing law, indicating intent to use same.

2-If the perpetrator intentionally discharged the weapon, this is a violation
of existing law, inviting prosecution.  (Gee, you say he IS under arrest?)

3-If the weapon discharged accidently (as his defense attorney argues) Then 
with the safeguards on a modern crossbow, particularly the safety inherent in
all our brains (DON'Y LEAVE IT LOADED/COCKED, STUPID!) then this is at the
very least criminal negligence far exceeding the ordinary duty of care of a 
reasonable person.

4-If this was accidental, then I'm William Tell!

WE DON'T NEED ANOTHER LAW!!!!!!!!!

Taran/John - Certified Firearms Instructor