GNOME Frequently Asked Questions | ||
---|---|---|
<<< Previous | Next >>> |
Even if you have followed every instruction to the letter, sometimes unforeseen problems arise. Anything can go wrong, from a misreading of the instructions, to a bug in the software, to a bug in someone else's software. Here, we try to address problems that people have run into with GNOME.
Here are some more general questions that arise often. Specific problems are later in this chapter.
OK, first thing you do is pause, relax, and take a deep breath. Next, look through this FAQ, the Users Guide, and any other documentation you have handy and see if any of it comes close to solving your problem. Next, look through the mailing list archives (instructions are given above) to see if someone else talks about your problem. Then try whatever it was you were doing one more time to see if the solution suddenly presents itself. If none of that works, it's time to ask on the list.
First of all, you are subscribed to gnome-list, right? If you aren't, instructions on how to subscribe are given above. Now, when asking for help on GNOME-list, give lots of detail. Posting "The panel doesn't work, this sucks!" doesn't help you or us. You still have the problem, and we have a possible bug which we have no information about. It is more useful (but still not sufficient) to say "Whenever I select the foo item from the Foot menu, the entire panel disappears suddenly; by the way, what is this file that GNOME keeps putting in my home directory, it's called core."
Ideally, we need several pieces of information from you. First, exactly what kind of system are you running on? No, not everyone runs the same operating system you are using. We need processor type: Sparc, MIPS, i386 (this includes Pentiums, AMD, Cyrix, etc), PPC, Alpha, ARM, 680x0, et al; we need operating system: Linux distribution, FreeBSD, HURD, OpenBSD, Solaris, IRIX, CrayOS, OS/400, whatever. Also include the version of the operating system. For example, the machine I'm on right now is a GNU/Linux RedHat/i386 Rawhide machine, a friend of mine uses a Solaris Sparc 2.6 machine.
Next, we need some relevant vital statistics of what is on your system. On a GNU/Linux system, the kernel and libc version numbers are almost always relevant. On almost all GNOME problems we need your glib, gtk+, Imlib, ORBit and gnome-libs versions. If you aren't sure if you need any of the above, include them anyway. Other things that are sometimes relevant are versions of Perl, X11, Python, Guile and libpng, unless you see an error message that mentions one of them, you can leave them out. Also important is how you installed GNOME. Did you use binaries, if so which ones? Did you use tarballs? Did you use CVS, if so which dates and/or tags? If you used a mixture of the above, tell us.
Lastly, we need the problem itself. We need to know exactly what you did to get the problem. We need to know if the problem is consistent or intermittent. We need to know if the program output anything prior to the problem. We need to know exactly what happens when you run into the problem. If you want to get ambitious, try some of the diagnostic tools I discuss below, such as a backtrace, and include the information in the mail.
Now before you are ready to post, you need to come up with a good subject line. Gnome-list can have a lot of messages on it, you want yours to stand out to the people you need help from, and be safely passed over by people who can't help. A subject of "GNOME is broken" is likely to get passed over; one of "GSM sucks" will get people in an angry mood, not a helpful one; something like "Most panel icons on HP-UX are just black squares" is likely to get the right sort of attention.
Put this all together into one long email and post it onto the list. If you followed my advice, you are more likely to get a quick, thoughtful response. If for some reason you don't get a quick response, don't take it personally, the mail probably just got lost in the volume. Wait a couple of days, see if there is any detail you can add, or perhaps a more descriptive header, and post it again.
If you find a bug, we want to know about it, we want to track it, and we want to fix it. To make this process as efficient as possible, we borrowed Debian's excellent bug tracking system. Full instructions on how to use it can be found at http://bugs.gnome.org/Reporting.html.
There are a few things to keep in mind in sending bugs to the system. First make sure to check the web front end at http://bugs.gnome.org to make sure that your bug isn't yet known to the system. If it is a new bug, send it to submit@bugs.gnome.org. Make sure you include the Package and Version headings as described in the instructions, this will make sure it gets routed quickly and automatically to the right people. Make sure you include full details. See the previous question for some suggestions on what is useful to include. If a backtrace or strace is appropriate, by all means include it. Instructions on how to do this is given below.
After you submit the bug to the system. You will get feedback on the bug via email. You also can track the status of the bug through the bug tracking system's web front end.
When GNOME is compiled, you need to specify where it is located in the filesystem. The option used to specify this is called --prefix, so we call it the GNOME Prefix, or prefix for short. GNOME's file locations should be the same from system to system, except for the prefix, so a file in /usr/share/gnome/pixmaps on one system may be in /opt/gnome/share/gnome/pixmaps on another, and we would refer to the location as $prefix/share/gnome/pixmaps.
If you installed from tarballs (or CVS), but never gave configure (or autogen.sh) a prefix, the default is /usr/local. If you installed the RedHat RPMS, they use a prefix of /usr. If you still aren't sure, type which panel, and remove the /bin/panel from the end. What's left is your prefix.
Most Unix and Unix like systems have a feature called memory protection. What this means is the program is allowed to access some parts of memory (often called segments), but not others. If the program tries to access memory outside of the segments it is permitted to access, the system detects the problem and signals an error. This error is called a Segmentation Fault (abbreviated "segv" on some systems), and generally, the program will end suddenly, often leaving behind a core dump (see below).
What it all boils down to is there is a bug in whatever program you were running. The bug might be in the GNOME source code, it might be in the shared libraries your program uses, or it might be in the way the program was compiled. If you are unsure whether it is a bug in GNOME or somewhere else, ask about it on the list. If you are sure the bug lies within GNOME, please make sure it's on the bug tracking system.
In the early days of electronic computers, computer memory was a bunch of magnetic rings called cores, mounted on wires. This type of memory was called core memory. When a programmer wanted to see what was going on in their program, they would output a copy of what was in their core memory so they could analyze it. This output was called a core dump, and the term has remained long after core memory became obsolete.
In many Unix and Unix-like systems, the system will automatically produce a core dump when a program fails catastrophically, for example when it has a Segmentation Fault (see above). It generally puts the core dump into a file named core in the directory you were in when you ran the program. This file is very useful for debugging why the program failed, and can be used to produce a backtrace (see below). On the other hand, this file can be quite large, particularly if you aren't using it for debugging. If you can't afford to have core dumps, consult your system documentation to find out how to disable this feature.
An incredibly useful debugging tool is the backtrace. This is essentially a snapshot of exactly where in the program you are. It is most often done when a program crashes (exits unexpectedly, often with a segmentation fault or other error) or hangs (stops working but doesn't exit). In this answer, I'm going to have to assume you are using the GNU project's GDB debugger, since that's the most common one used with GNOME, and the one I've used. If you use some other debugger, consult your documentation.
There are two ways to do a backtrace. You can use a core file left when the program crashed, or you can run the program from within the debugger. I have found that running the program within the debugger is more reliable, but I will discuss using core files as well.
To run a program within GDB, go to an xterm (or equivalent), and type gdb <full name and location of program>, for example, to debug gtalk, you might do gdb /usr/local/bin/gtalk. GDB does not search the path, so you have to specify where the program is. If you want to run the program with arguments, don't put them here. You can specify command like arguments later.
GDB will then identify itself, and give you a (gdb) prompt. From here, you type run to start the program. If you want to run the program with arguments, put them here. For example, to debug gtalk with sound disabled, you would type run --disable-sound. The program will then start. Keep in mind the program will be slower than normal, and it will use a lot more memory.
Now you try to recreate the problem you had. Do whatever it is that caused the problem before. Once the program crashes, you should immediately see stuff in the debug session, and a (gdb) prompt. If the program hangs, wait until you are sure it is hung in the right place, and then hit Control-C in the debug session. It too should reply with a bunch of stuff, followed by a (gdb) prompt. At this prompt (whichever way you got to it), type bt. It will then reply with the actual backtrace.
Here's an example of a debug session. If you are asked for a backtrace, you should send in the whole thing:
$ gdb /usr/local/bin/gtalk GNU gdb 4.17 Copyright 1998 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions. Type "show copying" to see the conditions. There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for details. This GDB was configured as "i386-redhat-linux"... (gdb) run --disable-sound Starting program: /usr/local/bin/gtalk --disable-sound Program received signal SIGINT, Interrupt. 0x4049290d in __poll (fds=0x808c110, nfds=3, timeout=-1) at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/poll.c:45 ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/poll.c:45: No such file or directory. (gdb) bt #0 0x4049290d in __poll (fds=0x808c110, nfds=3, timeout=-1) at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/poll.c:45 #1 0x403c54e9 in g_main_poll (timeout=-1, use_priority=0, priority=0) at gmain.c:991 #2 0x403c516e in g_main_iterate (block=1, dispatch=1) at gmain.c:789 #3 0x403c58a1 in g_main_run (loop=0x80882e8) at gmain.c:912 #4 0x401cbf1d in gtk_main () at gtkmain.c:475 #5 0x804a629 in main (argc=2, argv=0xbffffaa4) at main.c:54 #6 0x40407c77 in __libc_start_main (main=0x804a570 <main>, argc=2, argv=0xbffffaa4, init=0x8049e10 <_init>, fini=0x804c7dc <_fini>, rtld_fini=0x40009c10 <_dl_fini>, stack_end=0xbffffa9c) at ../sysdeps/generic/libc-start.c:78 (gdb) |
To do a backtrace with a core dump is very similar. Change directories to the one which has the core dump, and then run gdb -c core <full name and location of program>. Again, GDB doesn't look at your path, you have to specify where to find the program. All you then have to do is type bt at the prompt, and send in the whole session.
The strace command performs a "Signal Trace". Using it will allow you to run a program while outputting system calls and signals. This is a much more verbose debugging tool than the backtrace, but sometimes you need the extra information an strace can give you. Getting an strace is easy, just type strace -o <output file> <command with args> into an xterm. For example, to do an strace on the gtalk program with sound disabled, I might do strace -o /tmp/gtalk.strace gtalk --disable-sound. This will save the strace output in /tmp/gtalk.strace. Strace does make use of the path, and does accept program arguments on the command line.
Warning, strace produces lots of output (the above strace example came up with 5,498 lines in five seconds). Don't send straces to the mailing lists, and only send them to the developers if they specifically request it.
On Solaris systems, the strace command does something different. The truss command is probably what the person who asked for the strace is looking for.
<<< Previous | Home | Next >>> |
How can I use WindowMaker with GNOME | Specific Compile Problems |